Jump to

Antitrust

What is Antitrust?

Antitrust law refers to regulations that promote market competition by limiting monopolistic behavior, price-fixing, and anti-competitive mergers, ensuring fair markets for businesses and consumers.

Major Antitrust Laws

Key US antitrust laws include the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) prohibiting monopolization and restraint of trade, the Clayton Act (1914) addressing anti-competitive mergers, and the FTC Act establishing the Federal Trade Commission. EU competition law operates under Articles 101 (anti-competitive agreements) and 102 (abuse of dominance) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Other jurisdictions have similar frameworks.

Antitrust in Tech

Big tech companies face significant antitrust scrutiny globally. Major cases include US v. Google (search distribution), US v. Microsoft (1990s), EU vs. Google (Android, AdSense, Shopping), Apple App Store cases, and Meta investigations. The Biden administration has taken a more aggressive stance, blocking deals previously considered approvable. Tech regulations like the EU’s Digital Markets Act create new ex-ante rules for ‘gatekeepers’.

Antitrust in M&A

Most significant mergers require antitrust review (HSR Act in US, EU Merger Regulation, similar frameworks globally). Antitrust review can: clear deal unconditionally (most outcomes), impose conditions (divestitures, behavioral commitments), or block deal entirely (Meta/Within, Microsoft/Activision initially). For startups, antitrust risk is increasingly relevant in exits to large strategic acquirers. Smart founders consult antitrust counsel when assessing acquisition offers from market-leading buyers.

References

Antitrust for Turkish tech companies

Turkish competition law (Law No. 4054, enforced by the Rekabet Kurumu) tracks EU doctrine and reaches startups earlier than founders assume. The live touchpoints: merger control with turnover thresholds — and a technology-company carve-out that removes thresholds for acquisitions of tech undertakings, capturing startup exits that would otherwise pass unnoticed; vertical agreements (exclusivity, MFN/parity clauses, resale-price maintenance) embedded in ordinary commercial contracts; dominant-platform conduct rules tightening through legislative work mirroring the DMA; and dawn-raid powers the Authority uses actively, with on-the-spot fines for obstruction. The startup-relevant habit: competition review of standard distribution and platform agreements before they scale, and early merger-control analysis in any exit with Turkish nexus.

Related practice areaCompetition →