{"id":7327,"date":"2024-06-03T15:22:42","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T15:22:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/term\/antitrost\/"},"modified":"2025-12-03T12:39:42","modified_gmt":"2025-12-03T12:39:42","slug":"antitrost","status":"publish","type":"term","link":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/tr\/term\/antitrost\/","title":{"rendered":"Antitr\u00f6st"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Antitr\u00f6st hukuku, piyasa h\u00e2kimiyetinin kurulmas\u0131, kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve suiistimal edilmesini d\u00fczenler. Baz\u0131 b\u00f6lgelerde, \u00f6rne\u011fin Amerika Birle\u015fik Devletleri\u2019nde, rekabet hukuku ile e\u015f anlaml\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019nde antitr\u00f6st, h\u00e2kim piyasa konumunun davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 ve rekabeti engelleyici anla\u015fmalar\u0131 d\u00fczenlemeye \u00f6zg\u00fc olup, birle\u015fme denetimini kapsamaz.  <\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/DALL%C2%B7E-2024-06-03-18.01.40-A-formal-uncomplicated-image-representing-antitrust-concepts.-The-image-should-include-elements-like-a-balanced-scale-symbolizing-justice-an-illustr.webp\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6742\"><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ABD Antitr\u00f6st Yasalar\u0131<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Bu yasalar, piyasa rekabetinin adil \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini, t\u00fcketicilerin tekelle\u015fmeci uygulamalardan korunmas\u0131n\u0131 ve ekonomik adaletin sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 temin eder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Sherman Antitr\u00f6st Yasas\u0131<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Sherman Antitr\u00f6st Yasas\u0131, rakipler aras\u0131nda fiyat belirleme, teklifleri manip\u00fcle etme veya rekabeti k\u0131s\u0131tlama amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lan anla\u015fmalar\u0131 yasaklayarak rekabeti engelleyici davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlamay\u0131 ama\u00e7lar. Ayr\u0131ca, bir piyasay\u0131 tekelle\u015ftirmek veya tekelle\u015ftirmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs etmek de yasa kapsam\u0131nda yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. Bir firma, bir \u00fcr\u00fcn veya hizmette piyasa g\u00fcc\u00fcne sahip ve bu g\u00fcc\u00fc rekabeti engelleyici davran\u0131\u015flarla elde etmi\u015f veya s\u00fcrd\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015fse, yasa uyar\u0131nca hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir tekel sahibi kabul edilir. Sherman Yasas\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki ihlaller hem cezai hem de hukuki yollarla dava konusu yap\u0131labilir.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Clayton Yasas\u0131<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Clayton Yasas\u0131, adil rekabeti te\u015fvik etmeyi ve t\u00fcketicilere zarar veren uygulamalar\u0131 \u00f6nlemeyi ama\u00e7lar. Yasaya g\u00f6re, rekabeti engelleyebilecek eylemler, \u00f6rne\u011fin yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 birle\u015fmeler, ba\u011flama (tying) anla\u015fmalar\u0131 ve y\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 fiyatland\u0131rma yasakt\u0131r. Yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 birle\u015fmeler, iki \u015firketin rekabeti \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde azaltacak veya tekelle\u015fmeye yol a\u00e7acak \u015fekilde birle\u015fmesi durumunda s\u00f6z konusudur. Bu t\u00fcr birle\u015fmeler, t\u00fcketiciler i\u00e7in daha y\u00fcksek fiyatlara veya azalan \u00fcr\u00fcn se\u00e7eneklerine ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar i\u00e7in d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccretler veya s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 istihdam olanaklar\u0131na yol a\u00e7abilir. Ba\u011flama anla\u015fmalar\u0131, bir \u015firketin m\u00fc\u015fterileri bir \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc sat\u0131n almaya zorlayarak ba\u015fka bir \u00fcr\u00fcne eri\u015fim sa\u011flamaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlar, t\u00fcketici se\u00e7imini ve rekabeti k\u0131s\u0131tlar. Benzer \u015fekilde, y\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 fiyatland\u0131rma uygulamas\u0131\u2014rekabeti ortadan kald\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla maliyetin alt\u0131nda fiyat belirleme\u2014rekabeti zedeler ve uzun vadede daha y\u00fcksek fiyatlara ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck \u00fccretlere neden olabilir.     <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ayr\u0131ca, Clayton Yasas\u0131, rekabetin b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc korumak amac\u0131yla ki\u015filerin rakip \u015firketlerin y\u00f6netim kurullar\u0131nda g\u00f6rev almas\u0131n\u0131 yasaklar. Bu uygulama, hassas bilgilerin payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve adil rekabeti zedeleyebilecek eylemlerin koordinasyonunu \u00f6nler. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Rekabeti Engelleyici Davran\u0131\u015flar <\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Antitr\u00f6st, di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle rekabet hukuku, rekabete y\u00f6nelik engelleri ortadan kald\u0131rmay\u0131 ve b\u00f6ylece t\u00fcketiciler ile di\u011fer piyasa akt\u00f6rleri i\u00e7in piyasa verimlili\u011fini art\u0131rmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lar. Hukuk, \u00f6ncelikle \u00fc\u00e7 davran\u0131\u015f kategorisini hedefler: (i) anla\u015fmalar, (ii) tekil firmalar\u0131n davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 ve (iii) birle\u015fmeler ve devralmalar. Genel olarak, antitr\u00f6st yasalar\u0131, rekabeti engelleyici anla\u015fmalar\u0131, h\u00e2kim konumda bulunan firmalar\u0131n veya tekellerin rekabet kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 uygulamalar\u0131n\u0131 ve rekabeti bozucu birle\u015fmeleri yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 kabul eder.     <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Anla\u015fmalar<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Amerika Birle\u015fik Devletleri hukukunda, Sherman Yasas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n 1. B\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc \u201cticaretin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131n\u0131\u201d yasaklar ve bu kapsam, rekabeti engelleyici anla\u015fmalar\u0131 i\u00e7erir. \u201cNaked restraints\u201d (do\u011frudan rekabet kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar) olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan baz\u0131 anla\u015fmalar, herhangi bir verimlilik veya yenilik yarar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, kendili\u011finden yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 (illegal per se) kabul edilir ve ilave inceleme gerektirmez. \u00d6rne\u011fin, rakipler aras\u0131nda fiyat belirleme, \u00fcretim payla\u015ft\u0131rma veya pazar b\u00f6l\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc (yani \u201ckarteller\u201d) amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lan anla\u015fmalar bu kategoriye girer. Kendili\u011finden yasad\u0131\u015f\u0131 olmayan anla\u015fmalar ise \u201crule of reason\u201d (ak\u0131lc\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme) kapsam\u0131nda incelenir; burada anla\u015fman\u0131n rekabeti engelleyici etkileri, rekabeti art\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 y\u00f6nleriyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r. Verimlilik ve yenilik, rekabeti destekleyen fakt\u00f6rler olarak de\u011ferlendirilir.    <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019nde antitr\u00f6st h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019nin \u0130\u015fleyi\u015fine Dair Antla\u015fma (\u201c<strong>TFEU<\/strong>\u201d) ile d\u00fczenlenir. S\u00f6z konusu antla\u015fmaya g\u00f6re, rekabeti s\u0131n\u0131rlama veya bozma amac\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan ya da etkisi olan anla\u015fmalar, \u00fcretken, verimli ve t\u00fcketiciler i\u00e7in faydal\u0131 olduklar\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmedik\u00e7e ge\u00e7ersizdir. Rekabeti do\u011frudan s\u0131n\u0131rlayan \u201cnaked cartel\u201dler, ama\u00e7lar\u0131 itibar\u0131yla rekabet kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 kabul edilir ve genellikle me\u015frula\u015ft\u0131rma \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamaz.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Tek Tarafl\u0131 Davran\u0131\u015f<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>ABD\u2019de Sherman Yasas\u0131, tekel olu\u015fturmay\u0131 ve tekelle\u015fmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fc yasaklar. Bir firman\u0131n sorumlu say\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in piyasa g\u00fcc\u00fcne sahip olmas\u0131 ve bu g\u00fcc\u00fc rekabet kar\u015f\u0131t\u0131 \u015fekilde kullanmas\u0131 gerekir. ABD hukuku, rekabeti te\u015fvik edici tek tarafl\u0131 eylemleri cayd\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in bu t\u00fcr eylemleri k\u0131namakta temkinlidir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, AB rekabet hukuku, h\u00e2kim konumun k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 yasaklar; bu durum mutlaka tekel g\u00fcc\u00fcne sahip olmay\u0131 gerektirmez ve hem s\u00f6m\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc hem de d\u0131\u015flay\u0131c\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 kapsar. (<a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/?uri=CELEX%3A62014CJ0413\">The Intel v. Commission<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Birle\u015fmeler<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>ABD antitr\u00f6st yasalar\u0131, rekabeti \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde zedeleyecek birle\u015fmeleri yasaklar. Kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, AB birle\u015fme d\u00fczenlemeleri, etkin rekabeti ciddi \u015fekilde engelleyecek birle\u015fmeleri yasaklar. Her iki sistem de, piyasa g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fc \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde art\u0131racak veya t\u00fcketici faydalar\u0131n\u0131 k\u0131s\u0131tlayacak birle\u015fmeleri \u00f6nlemeyi ama\u00e7lar. Yatay birle\u015fmeler (rakipler aras\u0131ndaki birle\u015fmeler) en fazla incelenenlerdir; ancak al\u0131c\u0131 ve tedarik\u00e7iler aras\u0131ndaki, potansiyel rakiplerle veya konglomeratlarla yap\u0131lan birle\u015fmeler de denetime tabi olabilir. AB hukuku, \u00f6zellikle yatay olmayan birle\u015fmelerde, ABD hukukuna k\u0131yasla daha kat\u0131 bir yakla\u015f\u0131m sergiler.    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Antitr\u00f6st hukuku, piyasa h\u00e2kimiyetinin kurulmas\u0131, kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve suiistimal edilmesini d\u00fczenler. Baz\u0131 b\u00f6lgelerde, \u00f6rne\u011fin Amerika Birle\u015fik Devletleri\u2019nde, rekabet hukuku ile e\u015f anlaml\u0131d\u0131r. Ancak Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019nde antitr\u00f6st, h\u00e2kim piyasa konumunun davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 ve rekabeti engelleyici anla\u015fmalar\u0131 d\u00fczenlemeye \u00f6zg\u00fc olup, birle\u015fme denetimini kapsamaz. ABD Antitr\u00f6st Yasalar\u0131 Bu yasalar, piyasa rekabetinin adil \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini, t\u00fcketicilerin tekelle\u015fmeci uygulamalardan korunmas\u0131n\u0131 ve ekonomik [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[129,130],"class_list":["post-7327","term","type-term","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corporate-tr","category-kurumsal-ve-duzenleyici"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/term\/7327","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/term"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/term"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7327"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/term\/7327\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7432,"href":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/term\/7327\/revisions\/7432"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7327"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/virconlegal.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7327"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}